Complex Politics Mark The Work Of Thor Halvorssen

The respected human rights activist Thor Halvorssen is well known for the role he plays as a leader in this community, but has also found himself explaining his political views on a number of occasions. The Venezuelan activist describes himself as a liberal in his political views and has crossed swords with other activists after he began revealing the human rights abuses committed by socialist and left leaning governments; the traditional stance from liberal human rights groups has been to ignore the issues of human rights in socialist governments as they usually share a political stance with individual activists.

Responses provided by Thor Halvorssen to questions of his political stance have always remained on the same theme of the film producer not particularly caring about politics in any form other than in relation to human rights; the Halvorssen family has a long history of political involvement in Venezuela and Norway, a history Thor does not seem particularly keen to add to. Despite his family playing a key role in the opposition to the socialist Chavez Government of Venezuela and those leaders who have followed in the country after the death of Hugo Chavez, Thor himself has revealed he does not have any plans to run for office; in fact, the need for independence from political issues has led to Thor locating his own Human Rights Foundation in New York where he feels the group will be left to work without obstruction.

Despite the lack of interest Thor Halvorssen states he has in politics he has been willing to aid a socialist newspaper in Norway that was being forced out of business due to financial problems. The opposition Thor Halvorssen has shown to socialist governments around the world who strip their citizens of human rights led to his invitation to appear on the Fox Business Channel to discuss the Presidential candidacy of Democrat and self described socialist Bernie Sanders; Thor Halvorssen has stated his belief he shocked Fox journalists and producers by backing the candidacy of Sanders as his human rights record was untarnished, in contrast to the records of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.

 

WHY GEOFF CONE’S 2012 VIEWS ON NEW ZEALAND TAX REGIME IS STILL VALID

The media coverage of international asset transactions and tax havens tend to be coloured by a fair bit of hyperbole. In a 4 year old article published in the New Zealand Herald website, a similar view is expressed by the guest author who happens to be one of the foremost authorities in New Zealand on domestic and international tax law. Geoffrey Cone, a lawyer with over 35 years of experience in the field of global finance and taxation planning, was responding to media coverage of New Zealand’s foreign trusts regime in 2012. The subject remains even more pertinent as 2016 draws to a close and Mr. Cone’s views espoused in that feature has not diminished in their significance.

The primary bone in contention regards a largely farcical question: is New Zealand a “tax haven”? Mr. Cone dismantles that notion in its entirety by laying out a formidable array of unassailable facts, which are even more in the present day. For starters, tax havens are by their very nature antagonistic to the idea of transparency. It just so happens that New Zealand places higher than many developed nations, including our trans-Tasman neighbors, on global transparency indexes.

The OECD keeps a list of nations whose regulatory regimes qualify them as tax regimes and New Zealand most certainly do not figure in that last. Conversely, according to Mr. Cone, the nation does figure in a list maintained by OECD, but one that lists the nation that display a high degree of compliance with international tax regulatory conventions and agreements.

And speaking about international agreements, New Zealand is signatory to 39 double tax agreements with prominent members of the international community, as well as 20 special tax information exchange agreements. In the global crusade against tax evasion and illegal money transactions, information exchange plays a pre-eminent role. And as ably demonstrated by Mr. Cone, New Zealand is an active proponent of transparency, tax standards and robust regulatory regimes.

Such a positive international reputation has enhanced New Zealand’s status as a safe and dependable global destination for asset planning and protection, not tax planning and certainly not tax evasion, according to Mr. Cone. And expert legal and tax professionals like Geoffrey Cone has been at the forefront of this thriving financial sector industry, a valuable addition to the New Zealand economy over the years. Mr. Cone is a principal partner in Cone Marshall, an Auckland based law firm focusing exclusively on international finance and tax planning.

Mr. Cone, an alumnus of The University of Otago, New Zealand, is a seasoned lawyer who specialized in tax and trust law. In a career spanning almost four decades, his legal practice in commercial and tax law has seen him appear at all levels of the New Zealand legal system including the Privy Council. Mr. Cone also has spent significant time overseas as international litigator. He started Cone Marshall Limited along with his principal partner Karen Marshall in 1998.

Ricardo Tosto de Oliveira Carvalho: A Leader in the Brazilian Legal Profession

The legal profession in Brazil is governed by the Order of Lawyers, equivalent to the bar or law society in most English-speaking countries. The country’s legal system is civil-law based, meaning it relies heavily on interpretation of codified laws and not on legal precedent and jurisprudence, which are more important in common law countries. The Order of Lawyers is a self-regulating organization which controls admission to the legal profession. Each state has a section of the Order, and a uniform bar exam is necessary to gain admission.

 

Admission to the Order of Lawyers requires a law degree, which usually requires five years of study. There is no post-graduate experience requirement, although law school curricula require an internship or practical experience. In recent years, bar pass rates have been extremely low, with many candidates repeating the exam several times before finally succeeding.

 

As in most civil law jurisdictions, the law is an extremely academic field in Brazil. Before the first Brazilian universities were founded in the 1930s, law schools were among the most important cultural institutions in the country. Law is one of the most competitive majors at tuition-free public universities, with aspiring lawyers taking admissions exam cram courses for years while in high school.

 

 Ricardo Tosto de Oliveira Carvalho is a leader in the Brazilian legal community. Mr. Tosto began as a solo practitioner and in a short time became become an international figure in high-stakes corporate litigation. His firm,Leite, Tosto, and Barros is among the 500 leading firms in the country. He attended law school at Mackenzie Presbyterian University in Sao Paulo, graduating with distinction, and went on to build the prestigious firm with offices in Sao Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, and Brasilia. The full-service firm practices in a wide range of areas, especially credit recovery and public law, as well as general litigation.

 

Mr. Tosto is also an accomplished author who has published an original, innovative work takes a fresh look at a historical trial from a contemporary perspective. Tosto’s book, The Trial of Tiradentes, weighs the evidence in the famous plot to overthrow the Portuguese colonial government in Brazil.

 

Visit https://leitetostoinforma.wordpress.com/category/ricardo-tosto/ for more about Ricardo Tosto.

Coming Forward as a Whistleblower

It can be a very difficult and precarious position to be in possession of information that may be criminal in nature, especially if it deals with organizations that have a lot of control over the lives of the American people. However, this type of situation has been a common occurrence for a very long time, although times have changed drastically when it comes to what people in these positions can do. In the past, if you were to come forward with certain information that could expose those people and organizations in power above you, there was not a great deal of protection. In fact, a lot of people that have become whistle blowers in the past without the Dodd-Frank Act protections and various other things that have been designed to protect these people, there was a lot they were facing. Many people that have come forward have been fired from their jobs and have literally been eradicated from the fields of business that they worked in. This has been a reality of a lot of people who have been considering whether or not to come forward.

It can be a difficult decision to know that certain things you may know may literally put you in jail for coming forward, yet are wrong and may be in direct violation of our very constitution. This can truly put people on a fence, where they have to make a decision to put themselves out there and literally risk everything, which may be even harder if they have a family to provide for, or to keep quiet about something they know is wrong. This turmoil is not something that anyone should have to go through or deal with, which is why it is so great that there are now whistle blower programs that provide a massive amount of protection.

To add to this huge benefit, the fact that these whistle blowers are putting themselves out in the open for scrutiny and for risk to their livelihoods, there are now incentives in the form of monetary amounts. If anyone wants to come forward with information, there is no question that the best thing to do is to get a highly qualified attorney. Not having a lawyer is just asking for problems, so do your research and find an attorney who specializes in whistle blower cases, as there are more and more of these lawyers concentrating on these cases today.

The New Laws that Protect the SEC Whistleblowers

In 2010 there was a great change in financial guidelines when new laws were passed by the United States Congress to protect whistleblowers who offer to give information to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on any company that does not operate by the laws of the federal securities. These two laws are the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and the Consumer Protection Act. They were the first changes that were made since the occurrence of the Great Depression.

Since the implementation of the two acts, many law firms have emerged to offer legal services and advocate for the rights of the SEC whistleblowers. Lebaton Sucharow is a good example of the companies. It was a pioneer firm in the sector and is currently well organized and able to offer proper representations for any individual who seeks its representation. The company’s litigation program is well structured, they have a very competent group of investigators that are managed by a Whistleblower Representation Practice, financial specialists, and forensic analysts who have excellent knowledge of the state and federal laws and can provide outstanding representation. Jordan A. Thomas is the current head of the firm. Mr. Thomas is a former Assistant Chief Litigation Counsel of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement as well as its Assistant Director. During his tenure at the organization, he was vital in the drafting and implementing of the Whistleblower Program.

According to the guidelines of the programs, the whistleblower should be awarded 10-30 percent of the sanctions money by the SEC if his or her information leads to the collection of a sum amounting to one million dollars. The job security of the individual should also be secured. The Doff-Franck laws state that it is illegal for an employer to retaliate against the person who informed the SEC of fraudulent activities of the business. Whistleblowers who wish to offer information but keep their identities anonymous are advised to use the services of an attorney. All informants should not reveal their identity or that of the lawbreaker while reporting cases. One can reach the SEC Whistleblower attorneys to learn more about the program.